Section 1. Housing. I can see that this is a very
emotive issue, but agree in principle that you have thought long and hard and
hard and agree and think it should be emphasized that we as a community will
support housing devleopment but wish to have some control over what the houses
look like and where they are built. If Gleeson's appeal is upheld I feel
Malmesbury will become swamped totally and the infrastructure fail. The
housing development shown on your map seems to me to be the most suitable.
Section 2.Housing mix is very important, particularly support Burnham House
development. Section 3. Supermarket, Waitrose please. I realise controversial
site but agree position and closeness to High Street will work - keep an eye on
what Waitrose want to sell to protect our High Street shops. Section 5.
Extension to existing Primary School much better than a new school proposed by
Gleeson . Also High School will need to be extended. Section 6. Mention of
football please don't forget Athelstan Players we flood regularly too - we need
to be moved! Section 8. Please do not build more ghetto housing- small mews
type housing ideal- please have some gardens &
Malmesbury Neighbourhood Steering Group
What others are saying about our Draft Neighbourhood Plan Over 500 residents have already looked at the draft plan. These are the comments that they have made about it.
Our consultation runs from the 5th of March 2013 to April 26th 2013. These are the published comments received up to 08/03/13.
All comments below were submitted to this online feedback portal. We hold the identity and addresses for each submission and have decided not to publish them unless specifically requested by the person who submitted them.