"Section 3 as a whole. Site selection based on criteria so heavily weighted to support
development on the chosen site, there could be no level playing field.
Councillors and MNSG members soliciting responses from the developers of the
site, which is a matter of record, engenders no faith in the process. Precedent
setting for building on green fields within a conservation area. Willful
ignorance of retained policies relating to Conservation area build. No weight
given to the opinions of WDC professional officers who comment on poor design,
fundamental harm to the town and 1000 years of history being lost. A confused
approach from MNSG on criteria. Loss of heritage assets identified as a reason
for Gleeson objection. Preserving abbey views identified on page 29 of the plan
as a consideration, yet ignored for a supermarket application."
Scroll down for more
Malmesbury Neighbourhood Steering Group
Our consultation runs from the 5th of March 2013 to April 26th 2013. These are the published comments received up to 08/03/13.
All comments below were submitted to this online feedback portal. We hold the identity and addresses for each submission and have decided not to publish them unless specifically requested by the person who submitted them.